In this episode, Prateek Shrivastava, Advanced Analytics Manager at Cummins and Shashank Garg discuss the transformative impact of AI and data science on supply chains. They discuss how businesses are using AI to proactively address challenges, from predicting truck failures to preventing inventory shortages. Prateek also explores the shift from traditional BI to AI-driven insights and how smart tools are strengthening Cummins’ supply chain resilience. Tune in for an insightful conversation on how technology is reshaping the future of supply chain management!
Complete the form to view the episode
Suvajit Basu, Entrepreneur, CIO, and IT leader at top CPG firms, joins Shashank Garg for an insightful conversation on how Generative AI is shaking up Business Intelligence. They dive into how AI is pushing past traditional static dashboards and transforming decision-making with real-time, dynamic insights. Suvajit shares why solid data foundations are crucial and why businesses need to embrace an AI-first mindset to stay ahead. It’s not just about replacing BI – it’s about rethinking how AI and BI can work together to unlock smarter, faster, and more impactful decisions.
Suvajit Basu, Entrepreneur, CIO, and IT leader at top CPG firms, joins Shashank Garg for an insightful conversation on how Generative AI is shaking up Business Intelligence. They dive into how AI is pushing past traditional static dashboards and transforming decision-making with real-time, dynamic insights. Suvajit shares why solid data foundations are crucial and why businesses need to embrace an AI-first mindset to stay ahead. It’s not just about replacing BI – it’s about rethinking how AI and BI can work together to unlock smarter, faster, and more impactful decisions.
- (01:34) Suvajit’s Professional Journey
- (04:47) The Evolution of BI and AI
- (08:25) AI and BI: Complementary Technologies
- (17:46) The Power of AI Synergy in Personalization
- (22:59) Technological Shifts and Innovations
- (29:58) Advice for AI Adoption
“I think BI and AI are complementary. They’re not one or the other. People are coming to realize that AI is making certain things easier, but you still need the data foundation, you still need that data pipeline, you still need the basic reports. And then if you want to create more knowledge out of reports, Gen AI is very good at that.” – Suvajit Basu
“I’m also a big fan of worrying about the interaction between AI and humans. And I believe that we’re going to see hyper adoption only when AI learns from humans. Their queries, actions, feedback. So, unless we create that hyper-collaboration, the closed loop right, you’re not going to see the benefits that we expect out of hyper-personalization or a democratized decision making.” – Shashank Garg
0:00:00.2 Shashank Garg: Hello everyone and welcome to the Intelligent Leader podcast. I’m your host Shashank. And today we have with us, Suvajit Basu. And we are going to have an exciting conversation around the role of AI in the world of business intelligence or AI versus BI. And specifically, look at how AI is disrupting the BI world. Suvajit is an award-winning Digital Transformation and IT Executive who combines strategic vision with hands-on expertise to drive exceptional growth for enterprises. Winner of many prestigious awards, he was recently awarded the Enterprise CIO of the Year at the Inspire CIO Orbie Awards. Congratulations Suvajit, often described as the Chief Inspiration Officer. That’s a new one, Suvajit, I had not heard of that one. Suvajit is known for leading teams with inspiration and translating ambitious ideas into scalable and impactful solutions. His industry expertise spans CPG, supply chain, food and beverage, and media and entertainment. Suvajit, once again, welcome to the show. It’s a pleasure to have you here.
0:01:23.2 Suvajit Basu: Thank you. Chief Inspiration Officer was given to me by Bob Evans, who is a great communications person and it’s not really my official title, but I found it pretty amusing.
0:01:40.3 Shashank Garg: Yeah, of course. Suvajit, just for our audience, would you like to share a little bit more about your professional journey, so our audiences know a little more about you?
0:01:48.0 Suvajit Basu: My professional journey is basically in three parts. And if I go back to my college days, you know, I have a bachelor’s in electrical engineering, then computer science because I fell in love with computers very, very early and then started fortunately went to NCR Teradata. Teradata is one of those huge, huge hardware-based data companies. Right. And that was about 25 plus years ago. So, I was fortunate to work there for four years and after that another four years at SGI Silicon Graphics, the premier company in 3D visualization, et cetera. But they ultimately came up with a product called Data Mine, which was based on ML algorithms and data mining. After that I went on to found a company. We built ERP software for the media business here in New York. That company was acquired by a company out of Silicon Valley in four years and then about 16 years ago went to work for a large CPG company here in New Jersey called Goya Foods and spent the majority of my career there. So ultimately as their CIO. So, it has been a great journey so far and will see what happens next.
0:03:19.5 Shashank Garg: Thank you, thank you for sharing that background and once again great to have you here, Suvajit. Just to get started, I was earlier in the day thinking about how the field of data and business intelligence and AI has evolved over the years. Then I read a stat that said that even today we know that in almost 80, 90% of the organizations, the whole KPI reporting & monitoring is still handled either through spreadsheets or static dashboards. And, you know, executive dashboards sort of continue to dominate board meetings. You know, they give you a pretty good job of giving you a view of what’s happened in the past. However, their focus on the present is very operational. They often don’t tell us what really happened, and very rarely would they tell you what’s going to happen next. That’s what you were talking about earlier, what you were doing 25 years ago. And obviously, by solely focusing on historical data, we are missing the opportunities of the future. Right. And just the context of, you know, is certainly missing. Right. I wanted to sort of open up and let you share your view. How do you think the recent advancements in technology and AI, you know, what’s really happening and how can they solve some of these problems? Just give us a lay of the land in your view.
0:04:47.8 Suvajit Basu: Well, you hit the nail on the head. You are a practitioner, and it shows. So that is what I think is the heart of the issue, right. BI is historical, right? And remember, we had different stages of maturity in BI, right? Where we build to get the data pipeline going, then we build reports, then we build dashboards, and then we build ultimately from that we create knowledge, right? And ultimately prediction and forecasting, etc. I think it’s only now with advancements in AI that we are getting to do all that much more easily. Before that, we had to deal with mathematical models and so on to make the forecasts, etc. But it’s only now that these large LLMs or large predictive models give us the ability to just ask, what is the elasticity of my product? Whereas before we’d have to get a massive set of POS data and make that happen.
0:06:03.1 Suvajit Basu: And just managing that data itself was a huge challenge. Right? So, this is the opportunity that is unfolding right in front of our eyes with AI. And that’s the thing. So, I think AI and BI are complementary technology, like accounting, BI is historical. We are accounting for what happened and then we are presenting that data. One of the challenges with dashboards is, you know, I think most dashboards are like eye candy. You have that funnel chart or a pie chart and that’s it. And there is some tremendous research done by people like Tufte and so on who has spent a lifetime looking at… Steven Few also has done a lot of work in that area, in how to make data actionable. And just by having a funnel chart or a pie chart doesn’t make that data actionable.
0:07:17.7 Shashank Garg: I think you made a lot of good points, and I’ll get to the predictive AI in just a little bit. But just the excitement we had a couple of years ago, 18 months ago, around the large language models and you heard statements like BI is dead. You know, Gen AI is going to replace the dashboards. Everybody’s going just wanted to talk to the data using natural language. And now we finally have the power. You will see things like conversational summaries, contextual insights, role-based personalization, and more pattern detection. And, in a lot of ways, you know, we expected by now, 18 months into it or two years into it, Gen AI would just disrupt BI tools. You would see BI platform companies falling off the charts, and replacements happening, but that hasn’t really happened. Right? And you know, it may be because of various reasons, but I’d like to get your take. Do you know what’s happening there?
0:08:25.1 Suvajit Basu: Well, to me it’s very simple. I think BI and AI are complementary. They’re not one or the other. Right? So people are coming to realize that AI is making certain things easier. But you still need the data foundation, you still need that data pipeline, and you still need the basic reports. And then if you want to create more knowledge or cull more knowledge out of reports, Gen AI is very good at that. Knowledge of data. Right? So, they’re complementary. I see them as complementary technology.
0:09:08.9 Shashank Garg: That’s a good way of putting it for our listeners who are contemplating or who are hearing pitches from Cool Gen. You know, Silicon Valley, VC-packed firms who are claiming they will retire all your dashboards. That may or may not happen anytime soon. Gen AI can certainly make it easy. At the end of the day, whether it’s… AI relies on a very well-developed semantic layer. As you would agree, Suvajit, and as you said, the data foundation and the business layer are on top of it. So, the BI tools have done a great job of creating, managing, and maintaining that semantic layer. And that’s really the hard part. And once that is developed, obviously you can use Gen AI to create wonders. Suvajit, do you have a view on, there’s a lot of technology available, and there are companies that just purely AutoML, like an AutoML capability. What’s their role in this whole mix in your mind?
0:10:12.5 Suvajit Basu: Let me give you a real-life example. So at my previous job, what happened is on Monday morning, all these reports, these BI reports came out and it was like this thick, right? And it went to all the C-level executives and key people. Then what would happen is a very smart analyst would basically look at this data, right? And would create an Excel, Word Excel document that, okay, your sellout level for this is this. These are the good points, these are the bad points, these are the things that you should think of in red, yellow and green. It was just a one-page summary of this thick report, but it took two or three days to come out because the person was going through all the data. That is the part that’s going to get disrupted. I think the analyst itself is going to get disrupted with AI, it’s going to augment that analyst, it’s going to be the co-pilot with that analyst which will come from that data. And people don’t have to wait for three days for that analyst report. It’ll be there on that Monday morning automatically available to you. And that’s the opportunity here.
0:11:31.7 Shashank Garg: I like the way you frame this. So there’s a role for everything. There’s certainly disruption, not in the whole cycle, but there is certainly disruption at the, what you’re calling an analyst role. Right? So I remember, we supported a client in the manufacturing space and we’ve been working with them for almost 12 years and we manage the whole data platform and the BI layer and the executive dashboards and all that. Right? And just a few, middle of last year we started working with them and say, can you really talk to the data? And the approach there was we create this analyst assist or, you know, so that where we combine the whole work they had done the foundational work, the semantic layer, the BI reports and then combine AI along with it so that you have an Interactive AI-enabled chatbot for the executives to allow tailored natural language interaction. And it’s done through the text right now, but very soon you can get to voice as they enable the multimodal capabilities in their organization, which they haven’t done yet.
0:12:46.2 Suvajit Basu: I like that. If I can just give you another example. So I’m an executive, on Monday morning, I’m coming into my… I’m driving in, my drive is half an hour 40 minutes. And in a multimodal AI environment, I can have the AI engine look at my reports and I can ask the questions interactively and the engine can tell me interactively and I can listen and be prepared for that meeting at 8:00 in the morning or 9:00 in the morning. Just like I’m listening to a podcast. But here is my own personal podcast for my company. What I’m going to do this week, who am I going to talk to, what decisions am I going to make and what am I going to suggest making my operations run much better? So, it’s a custom podcast of my reports that I’m going to listen to on my way, and I love that.
0:13:44.6 Shashank Garg: The way you put it. I remember a few years ago, I don’t know if you remember this, when Amazon Echo or the Alexa, sorry, Alexa came out, right? One of the first experiments that people did and AWS promoted, they said hey, you could now talk to your dashboards. And that was so bad, that never worked because it wasn’t intelligent. All it was was, was trying to read verbatim and that never worked. But now that you can have an intelligent language model or an AI model-backed chatbot and that’s what we’re experiencing for this company. It’s night and day. You can actually talk, you can actually talk to the data and get to know the state of your business. It can help you prioritize, it can learn quickly even the order in which you are likely to ask questions. So, all of that can be served the way you would like.
0:14:39.3 Suvajit Basu: Shashank, in the last two months I have been spending 8 to 10 hours a day with the different AI engines, right? Whether it’s OpenAI, whether it’s Google’s NotebookLM or Google’s Gemini or what Amazon is doing, etc. All of them have their strengths and weaknesses, but things are moving so rapidly, it’s mind-blowing. You and I have lived through the dot com web era, the social media era. However, this is a whole different ball game. And I encourage companies like yours to kind of build a prototype and show it to your clients. And once they see it, I think the light bulb is going to go and say, Shashank, I want it more. I want it more.
0:15:39.7 Shashank Garg: Yeah. And I have experienced that Suvajit all of last year. We saw a lot of initial hesitation, especially with the compliance and cybersecurity teams clamping down on usage. Then we saw limited internal usage. We saw some models being brought up on-prem to avoid some sort of leakage of data. But it has happened with the cloud. We see that happening with… There are still issues there obviously, so you must be careful as a CIO, but I’m starting to see increased pickup. And you’re so right. The moment you do a pilot; people get excited and then is when they start talking about possibilities because you are… It’s very hard in this space with the pace at which innovation is happening, to predict or to even lay out the business use case. It’s like you do something and then you think about more and then you do something and then you think about more. Right? It just goes on like that. Suvajit, would you like to discuss any more examples?
0:16:37.4 Suvajit Basu: I just want to say one thing from experience, everybody is going crazy about ChatGPT and LLMs and so on. But that’s not the only AI, right? There is predictive AI and then there is Gen AI. So, there is a difference there. Again, those two are complementary things. So, when we look at examples, I’ve seen retail planograms, you know, generation and optimization is a clear area that this kind of technology can play, that can help. Right? Because there is a lot of contextual information that happens with a planogram that is kind of not used except for maybe the dimensions. Right? So, we are infancy when it comes to that. So, I think retail planogram optimization, contextualization, there is a huge, huge potential there. Imagine the number of companies out there, what they’re trying to do in optimization and so on in AI.
0:17:46.6 Shashank Garg: Absolutely. What I’ve realized in our experiences is that the biggest wins are coming where you don’t look at traditional BI in isolation, you don’t look at predictive AI in isolation, you don’t look at Gen AI in isolation, but you look at them all together. So something where we are supporting one of our clients on the digital side and the eComm side and the fact that you can now in real-time identify subject to privacy laws, identify the individual married with their buying history profile, put them in a demographic profile and you know what they are gonna like and not like and then use that too, in real-time using an AI algorithm and then combined with generative AI to create product descriptions in real time. So, when Suvajit goes to the same website, you see a different description because of how your buying pattern is or how they have profiled you versus me, where I’m more likely to buy or more likely to see that product in a better way. So those are the kinds of things that excite me, that you’re not just looking at one of these things in isolation but are combining all these three complementary technologies to really create a huge impact.
0:19:13.0 Suvajit Basu: So, taking your concept of the digital twin and augmenting that knowledge, there is a huge opportunity to make things better, making decision making abilities simpler, more focused is where we need to go and therein lies that opportunity. Right? We can do… We can get out of that store by buying more things that apply to me faster because time is the most valuable resource, and AI is now giving me back a few minutes of my time.
0:19:47.8 Shashank Garg: Absolutely, Suvajit, thank you so much for sharing all those examples. Suvajit, I wanted to shift the conversation a little bit on sort of the state of technology. Technology has a huge role to play in making all the examples and bringing them to life. Would you like to comment on how you’ve seen the traditional technology sort of shifting or evolving? How do you see the current tech landscape? What’s your view there? What’s enabling the shift?
0:20:21.1 Suvajit Basu: I think like I was mentioning to you earlier, they’re basically a few buckets, right? Three buckets. One is the BI tools bucket and we all know that that’s Microsoft Power BI tableau and so on, where they’re coming from and then natural language queries after that. The second is the data science and the ML platform, a machine learning platform where we are looking and going through your data set and automatically inferring some things, right? Whether it’s that decision tree, what questions am I going to ask the customer to sell them this boat or this car, right? Automatically. And then the third is the data platform which is the base data layer. So, in that is Snowflake and Databricks and so on.
0:21:16.6 Shashank Garg: I like the way you segmented the tech landscape and just kind of what I’m seeing is at least with the traditional BI tools, I’ve seen all of them come out with their AI and Gen AI releases. So, one clicks advanced analytics, anomaly detection, top influencers, and conversational interaction with data. The only problem is that they would limit themselves to the data that is modelled on their platform. So, as a user, if your organization uses three different tools, then you’ll have three different talk-to-data agents in that approach. I’m excited to see stuff like semantic layer enrichment in almost all of them. I’m excited to see and talk about data features. I’m excited to see some contextual summarization now starting to happen within those technologies. I think everybody should be looking to use those and roll out those features if they haven’t done that. I’m also seeing a lot of excitement in the Data Science and AI platforms. The data IQs of the world or the Alteryx of the world, all of them have invested in AutoML capabilities.
0:22:29.0 Shashank Garg: So far at least for the simpler use cases where you can predict and data is clean and good. You can sort of reduce the time that used to be required to do the modelling. I think we should all be looking to use that. What’s an increasing trend now, Suvajit? I don’t know if you’ve noticed the Snowflakes and Databricks and even the AWS, the cloud platforms and all their… They started to insert a little bit of BI and AI in their data platforms themselves. So Snowflake came out with packaged offerings like Streamlit integration to build some quick apps like BI apps or reporting apps. They came out with the Cortex AI database has made a play recently, although very recently, they’re starting to add AI plus BI capabilities. That’s what they’re calling it. We’re seeing Amazon AWS making a push with Amazon Q, so AWS Q. So things are certainly starting to get interesting and I believe we are at the point where in all these three buckets you’re starting to see a lot of overlapping features.
0:23:40.9 Suvajit Basu: I actually forgot to tell you one of the biggest use cases that I have been…
0:23:45.5 Shashank Garg: Yeah, please.
0:23:47.0 Suvajit Basu: Working with in AI and BI. For the past, since 2019, 2018. So that’s about six, seven years now. Cybersecurity.
0:24:00.9 Shashank Garg: Oh, okay.
0:24:01.3 Suvajit Basu: Huge, huge. SIEMS, which were SIEM.
0:24:07.1 Shashank Garg: Yeah. Yeah.
0:24:07.6 Suvajit Basu: Is where we send all the log information.
0:24:10.1 Shashank Garg: Absolutely.
0:24:11.2 Suvajit Basu: The BI tools go in and look at it and then try to predict, oh, here is the anomaly.
0:24:15.5 Shashank Garg: Yeah. Patterns.
0:24:17.6 Suvajit Basu: The NextGen stuff that we have been using is all based on AI models. And that’s basically predicting here is a lateral movement or here is a bad actor or here is a breach. Right? And the best tools. And this is a BI talk, so I’m not going to get into cybersecurity tools. The best tools are the ones that use AI technology at its core to understand that a breach potentially can happen or has happened and then give you an alert, an intelligent alert. Right. And that is huge. Imagine the value of that, so.
0:25:01.1 Shashank Garg: No, no, absolutely, you bring up a good point. It’s going to pick up stuff, maybe false positives, but it’s going to pick up stuff for somebody to look at, so.
0:25:08.4 Suvajit Basu: Well, that’s where AI comes in. Right? The rule may give you a false positive. The AI decreases the number of false positives.
0:25:15.7 Shashank Garg: Absolutely. Suvajit, just to be the devil’s advocate, right? We spoke a lot about possibilities, use cases and how disruption can happen. You know, any callouts? What are you worried about? What are you worried about in this whole context?
0:25:32.1 Suvajit Basu: I’m actually very positive about where AI is going and the more and more, we’re using it, I think it’s all positive, it’s net positive because we as entrepreneurs, see the glass half full. So, I don’t think AI in our lifetime is going to take over the world and is going to start shooting at us like a Terminator. I don’t think that’s going to happen at all. So, I take a much more positive view of it. If you look at the brass tacks, one of the reasons AI is kind of hindered right now is because of the high cost of AI.
0:26:17.5 Shashank Garg: Yeah.
0:26:18.3 Suvajit Basu: So if you do, compared to BI. Right? If you get into AI right now and you want to create a product that will cost, you a lot of money because it takes a lot of computing and so on.
0:26:33.1 Shashank Garg: Absolutely.
0:26:33.8 Suvajit Basu: And that is making innovation for the smaller players harder to get into. It will push the innovation onto the bigger players. You look at what China has done in the last few years and there’s a great book I read, I don’t know where I have it right now, by Dr. Kai-Fu Lee and he was talking about this five, six years ago, superpowers in AI. Right. And you look at in the last few years how AI, whether it’s from Google, was a pioneer in this area. Microsoft ChatGPT and now Meta what they’re doing and Grok. It’s just unbelievable the amount of innovation and speed at which this has progressed and how everybody is catching up. But who is that small-time innovator, the little player working in their garage? Okay. Who’s making this incredible innovation? I think AI is costly, much more costlier than anything else right now. So that’s one of the things I wish and I’m starting to see the cost of AI governance center coming down. They’re coming down quite a bit. You know, Amazon with their announcements show that their costs are much less, 1/10 the cost of other AI. So costs are coming down those are good things. But that’s a good thing.
0:28:14.7 Shashank Garg: Y Yeah, absolutely. I was going to say when I talk to clients, we often advise them, number one, to look at the cost and see whether the incremental value is worth it. And you know now, with the level of innovation is such that the cost parameters change every three, six months, as you said. Right? Nova is, they’re claiming the models are going to be one-tenth of what exists in the market today and that’s disruptive. So I’m excited to see, that we’re starting to do some experiments there and we are actually very bullish on what you know, AWS put out there in terms of their Nova offering and we’ll see a real disruption. That’s what we are projecting. I think we are also seeing that vendor lock-in is, something that you know, clients should continue to, or enterprises should continue to worry about.
0:29:03.2 Shashank Garg: Think about who owns the models, think about who owns the IP because in this whole if you’re going use AI to differentiate then you have to own the IP. Needless to say, the whole privacy and security issues which obviously you know much more about that we have to continuously monitor for. And I think lastly, I think the human element and change management and whether when we have all these models and they’re giving the context and they’re predicting the right stuff, whatever we can do to ensure that people are explainable, and humans can really trust. Because eventually, the change will only happen… The results will only come when the person on the ground, that operational manager, is willing to take action and willing to bet their careers on what AI is telling you. I think that I see it to be an area of effort for all of us as professionals helping enterprises get ahead in their AI journey. Great. Suvajit, anything else you’d like to share or sort of advice for anyone who is considering, contemplating, thinking about moving fast or moving ahead in the use of AI, Gen AI and BI in general? What would you like to say?
0:30:19.0 Suvajit Basu: I think there are three things. Number one, start with a use case. Start with a use case in which you can say there is a definite ROI for the business. If you don’t see a use case like demand forecasting, customer segmentation, or operational optimization, you know, wait, talk to the business groups, they will tell you what it is. You know don’t just get into it. Number two, focus on governance and data quality. Don’t take that lightly. That’s a very, very important thing because data privacy, security, accuracy, those things are very important. Trust is very important. You know there were a lot of stories about Samsung putting in some IP out there and it was available to everybody. Microsoft copilot, kind of taking HR information or whatever, making it available to the whole company. So be careful, very careful with data governance because you’re gonna deal with very sensitive data with BI reports and so on. So be very, very careful with that. That’s very important. And number three is building a cross-functional team. They will help you get the business cases aligned between IT and the business. Go to the business leaders, have your data scientist with you, have your IT data team with you, work together to create that cross-functional team and then what you need also is a program to upscale your IT department and also your population of users.
0:32:08.6 Shashank Garg: Oh yeah, absolutely everyone. Yeah.
0:32:11.3 Suvajit Basu: Yeah. To upskill that and have fun projects around that. So, See, Copilot or Gemini or whatever other tools, you know. So that’s very important. So, three things, use cases, data quality, governance and building that cross-functionality.
0:32:32.6 Shashank Garg: That’s a great way to sort of package your advice. I love all those three callouts from my perspective. Suvajit, I’m genuinely excited about what all of this means for all of us and enterprises in the coming few quarters. I’m certainly expecting a lot more automation or assistance given to the analysts as you were talking about earlier. So the AI-first automated information insight workflows can really transform our decisions and speed up their actions. So I’m really looking for AI-enabled automation. I’m looking forward to the full data stack. So no more sort of isolated data engineering. You talked about cross-functional teams starting with a use case. So the more full stack you can think about and not silo your… You know remember how departments were siloed earlier. Right?
0:33:27.3 Shashank Garg: And even in some organizations, engineering is separate and analytics is separate and AI is separate. All of that is required. But you have to think about all of this as a subsystem for every use case. And the more we can take that approach, I think the more successful all of us are going to be. I’m also a big fan of worrying about the interaction between AI and humans. And I believe that we’re going to see hyper adoption only when… Because AI learns from humans. Right? Their queries, actions, feedback. So, unless we create that hyper-collaboration, hyper, the closed loop. Right. You’re not going to see the benefits that we expect out of hyper-personalization or democratized decision-making. Right. So that AI… Just keep in mind AI learns from humans. So, we have to have the human-in-the-loop to make the AI better. It’s not going to get better by itself.
0:34:17.6 Suvajit Basu: I like that human-in-the-loop, the copilot to make things better.
0:34:22.1 Shashank Garg: Thank you so much for coming on the show today. Your insights on AI, the call out for predictive AI versus generative AI and the whole impact on the data in the field of BI were incredibly valuable. Thank you for taking the time to share your experiences and expertise with us. To our listeners, we hope you enjoyed this episode of the Intelligent Leader, with me Shashank. If you liked what you heard, please consider sharing it in your network. Do not forget to hit the subscribe button and you can share this with the #intelligentleader. See you next time.
Megan Brown, Director, Global Center of Excellence for advanced analytics and data science at Starbucks, shares her insights on the power of data, technology, and change management in driving personalization and segmented marketing, while shedding light on both opportunities and challenges faced within Starbucks. She also discusses how AI, especially Generative AI, is shaping the future of analytics at Starbucks, touching on its influence on forecasting and SKU categorization.
- 01:11 Megan’s Role and Responsibilities
- 03:41 Navigating the Hype Cycle in Data Science
- 07:06 Building Trust in Data and Analytics
- 15:02 Generative AI and Future Trends
- 24:54 Advice for Data and Business Professionals
“You’re not going to have one bot to rule them all. You’re going to have a bunch of little bots doing their specific jobs. Maybe at some point you’ll have a secondary layer, a tertiary layer, great, cool. But you need to build those little bots first, and you need to figure out if they need to talk to each other, how you need to track them, like, how you’re maintaining them, all of these basic tech things that we don’t know yet, right? And so you need that in place. Whatever AIOps is going to be, before you really have thousands of agents talking to each other, potentially making, prescriptive decisions for your company, right? Like, where’s your checks and balances in that?” – Megan Brown
“The setup of the data platform and ensuring the right, um, glossary and metadata and quality. and consistency, that’s hard work. And if you apply, AI in general and specially generative AI to reduce the drudgery of people who manage it, I think that’s a huge win.” – Shashank Garg
0:00:07.3 Shashank Garg: Hello, everyone, and welcome to the Intelligent Leader podcast. I’m your host, Shashank. And today we have a very, very exciting leader with us, Megan Brown from a very coveted, loved brand globally, Starbucks. I just got my coffee. Megan is the director for the Global Center of Excellence for Advanced Analytics and Data Science at Starbucks. She’s an analytics leader with about 20 years of experience applying all the scientific methods, statistics, machine learning, to inform decisions in a variety of fields. And I’m gonna let her talk about what she does today. They are curious and passionate about solving hard problems, making it easier to use data and analytics to influence business strategy and tactics. And they have earned their PhD in cognitive psychology. Is that right, Megan?
0:01:05.0 Megan Brown: Yeah, yeah.
0:01:06.3 Shashank Garg: From the University of Wisconsin. So let’s kick things off. First of all, thank you so much for joining in. And could you maybe just describe your role a little bit more. What are the stakeholders? What exactly do you do?
0:01:19.3 Megan Brown: So my role is the part of our data analytics and data science insights org that faces internationally. And so when we say international, it’s actually a very different business model from the rest of Starbucks. So, it’s more like a business-to-business consulting role where we take our most effective and incremental use cases and apply them to other markets. There’s a lot of variation between what we do in North America and what we do internationally because there’s so much difference between, say, customers, the partners who work in those markets, the data systems that we have in place, and also just the way of work in international is necessarily different ’cause you’re not in the same time zone. So everything’s a little wonky. Yeah.
0:02:10.0 Shashank Garg: Yeah, yeah.
0:02:11.0 Megan Brown: And then in terms of my personal life, I am a parent of three kids, they are six, almost five, he would want me to say that, and 10 months. I do some modern dance in my limited free time as a parent of three. And then I also write here and there, but not very well.
0:02:30.0 Shashank Garg: Awesome, awesome. Thanks for sharing. So you’re both a dancer and you make numbers dance, I’m assuming, so.
0:02:37.4 Megan Brown: You have to use all the parts of your brain.
0:02:40.0 Shashank Garg: Yes. I can understand your role, especially with the scope of international, with so many countries and different cultures and different people, and of course, different systems of data. So I can imagine the complexity of what you’re trying to juggle. So just to move forward, needless to say, I’m assuming you, with Starbucks international, you deal with vast amounts of data. What are some of the challenges you are encountering in your business? If you wanted to share?
0:03:14.0 Megan Brown: Yeah, I think one challenge is actually getting to an enterprise data platform. When push comes to shove, if your enterprise data platform isn’t in the top, whatever priorities, then you’re going to stand up multiple data platforms. Because everyone needs data and they’re going to do what they have to do to get there. And then you’re going to look back at this map of data platforms and you’re gonna say, huh, no one has a view of the whole company. And you’re gonna have to start to make changes on top of that. I think the other thing is we’re in an age of a lot of hype. And I think data science has generally got a really strong hype cycle to it where it’s like the new thing is so exciting, oh, it didn’t do what we thought. Oh, new thing, oh, so cool. Oh, it didn’t do what we thought.
0:04:07.0 Megan Brown: And I think that happens on small projects and large things like Generative AI is the obvious example right now. But the smaller things, for example, are data science use cases that they read about. Like we all read about personalization and all of these mainstream business things. And you’re like, oh, that’s great. And they say, it’s easy. You just need your data and you need a model and then it’s done. And then you work with teams who are like, yeah, let’s do that thing, let’s do it tomorrow. And you’re like, not tomorrow, actually. But one of the things we run into with that hype is they want the whole shebang, they want everything right away. But what they don’t realize is it’s going to fundamentally change their ways of work. It changes their business process, their marketing strategy, whether they trust data or not.
0:05:05.8 Megan Brown: And to go from one extreme to the other just sets you up to fail because there’s so many steps. Like, do you trust the data? Do you trust your loyalty tools? Do you trust your strategy to use this the right way? Is it returning the incrementality that you want? And if the answer to any of those is no, you’re just… This is gonna bomb, it’s just not gonna work out, so.
0:05:29.4 Shashank Garg: I think you bring up a really good point. And you talked about the hype that we see in the whole data science and AI, and especially fueled with the whole generative AI way, which came our way 18 months ago and two years ago, and then all the renewed interest in AI, which has always existed, but now everybody wants it. And the very real challenge of how do you help your business stakeholders navigate through the change? Do they trust themselves? And are they gonna let an algorithm take control and be accountable for what the algorithm is doing?
0:06:06.7 Shashank Garg: Yeah.
0:06:07.4 Shashank Garg: You’re bang on. Do you wanna, maybe, for the sake of our audiences, and this is a very real challenge. And I love the fact that you brought that up. Maybe take an example right there and see what exactly do you mean? Why is it so hard to trust and just go by it and in a fully automated fashion?
0:06:28.8 Megan Brown: Yeah. I can give a great example. So let’s say you have a brand new data platform. And this data platform is intended to take in your point of sale data, and one of your marketing platform data. And there wasn’t really any plan to engineer the data on top of that. There was a little bit of cleaning, but really, like, we just wanna show it as it is. Then when people go in to use the data, the data is still structured for machines. So to get your regular business metrics, you have to join across 12 tables. And like, there’s three people in your regional office that can do that. So the first step really is, if your data aren’t usable by humans, if they’re not structured for humans in a way that will make sense to how humans think, they’re not gonna be trusted. They’re going to always feel or look wrong.
0:07:28.0 Megan Brown: And then they’ll have their one or two people in the business that they think can do it the right way and they’ll pull different numbers. And then you have this conflict. So that’s one foundation is like, the data aren’t trusted, maybe we’re scared of the data because it’s new. And I don’t like no one would sign up and say, yes, I’m scared of new data. But we do see a lot of like fear behaviors. Like avoidance, attack whenever like the data doesn’t look exactly like what you want. Favored sources that are like, maybe not the main source. So if you don’t trust your data, and you’re trying to build some fancy models on top of it, let’s say for personalization, you’re not gonna… It’s kind of like the garbage in garbage out, but it’s like, not trusted in, not trusted out.
0:08:15.7 Megan Brown: Like, even if your data scientists are relatively sure that they’ve got the data the right way and the right shape with the right metrics and the right slices, if the business doesn’t believe that, because there’s just something fundamentally off. Then no matter what you build on top of it, it doesn’t matter if it’s a dashboard, doesn’t matter if it’s a pivot table, or a fancy model, the business is not gonna follow along the way you need them to. So you actually have to take them through a few stages of development. And you can do that at the same time as you’re building the fancy models. I don’t think these are necessarily serial, but they do have to have a source of data that they can trust, that is reliable, that is the main shared source of data.
0:09:04.0 Megan Brown: And they have to have a few people who can get the data into the right shape for them when they need it. But ideally, they’re going to dashboards. And then if they have new questions, or new metrics, or a new way of looking at some of their data, let’s say a driver’s model, they need to be able to see that and push it around. And then they’ll start to trust the models that are less explained, and less easy to explain.
0:09:29.8 Shashank Garg: Yeah, yeah. Well, you bring up a good point. You’re basically saying trust issues with data have existed ever since the field of data has existed, which is 3D case now. And data science and advanced analytics, it just puts another level of complexity and abstracts, and sometimes in a black box kind of way, which makes it even harder. And there is no way way around it. So you walk before you can run, and you take your users along and help them build that trust and there’s just no shortcut.
0:10:09.0 Megan Brown: There’s no shortcut and it’s kind of a culture challenge. It’s about changing how people make decisions for their jobs. And that’s very… Like, we as adults have a lot of ego. If someone said, we’re gonna do your job with AI now, you just sit there and watch it, I would really be concerned. So it’s probably fairly similar to that. I also think that once you have data in a model, I think what the business side doesn’t typically expect is that it’s gonna change how they do their job. It’s gonna change everything from strategy to their daily lived life. And I think if you think the data science solution is just like you flip a switch, and you get all this money, which sometimes you get lucky. But really, your team, your business team, like my counterparts in the business are going to have to change how they think and how they work pretty drastically to achieve those results. ‘Cause optimization, when you have humans involved, involves humans making different decisions than they would have without the data.
0:11:17.5 Shashank Garg: Megan, we spoke about challenges, and these are very, very valid challenges. Do you wanna also touch upon a little bit about some of the successes you may have had, either in your current role or prior roles, and sort of what worked, maybe use cases or tactics, whatever you wanna share?
0:11:37.0 Megan Brown: Yeah, I think in my current role, one of our big successes is actually having a use case that we have built over time with the participation of our stakeholders and our market leaders. So let’s pretend it’s personalization. So we started out fairly simple. And we have to go to these markets and say, “Alright, we’ve got something new for you. It’s not the fanciest thing, but it will get you to the fanciest thing. And we’ve got to start here.” And there were a few markets that are like, Oh, I don’t… We’re not, I don’t know about that, we’re not, like… That’s different. And we had to take it around to like 15 different markets. And we found two that were really excited about it and they were like, I’m not sure how we’re going to do that, but sounds interesting. Sign me up.
0:12:27.3 Megan Brown: And those two markets have really taken the lead in many ways and they’ve been nimble, and they’ve adjusted quite well. And what we’ve done with those markets, as we’ve built out this use cases, we’ve built it with them. So we listened to them about what is the next thing you want to see from this. What is the fanciest thing you can imagine? And would we actually do it. Our mission and values might actually, let’s say, not do dynamic pricing. Maybe you walk it back a little bit, what is the end point of this game and what are we building towards together? So you get the satisfaction of new features coming out fairly routinely. And then you also get the satisfaction of having this relatively big end goal. That’s been pretty exciting. And I think the other thing that I’m really proud of that’s completely different is from my prior role, which was about knowledge management and data literacy.
0:13:29.0 Megan Brown: Yeah. Completely different. You put a data scientist in charge of knowledge management, data literacy, what do they do? They make a spreadsheet of everything you’ve produced in the last three years, and they put it behind a dashboard. And they make it searchable and it’s a very silly search, it’s not smart, just a string search, nothing too fancy. But we were able to get into the APIs for everything we used. So we had a customer facing one that was like, internal Starbucks partners. What decks have we created? What videos have we created? What dashboards exist and what’s in them? So just making things a little more obvious, a little more transparent and easy to find. Because before that, used to have people, they would email their friend in Daibo and say, oh, have you heard about this thing?
0:14:18.0 Megan Brown: And the friend would say, let me go ask a friend. And that friend would… It’s like a two week chain of asking friends and we’re like, well, let’s just make it one search, use two words, get the deck, and you have what you need. We also had an internal facing one. So it went through the code, it went through Confluence, it went through Jira, it really did, it had everything from the external facing one and then also all of the ways that we’ve built these things. And I’m still really proud of that, I think it made a lot of people’s lives much easier and it sped up quite a bit. There was a bunch of other work we did around that that was very… It felt very much like public affairs, public relations. But that was like the data science kind of heart behind public affairs. Yeah.
0:15:08.4 Shashank Garg: Yeah, yeah. So if you were redoing it today in today’s world, would it be fair to assume that you would be tempted to put a Generative AI led chatbot or narrative summarization engine on top of it, right?
0:15:24.4 Megan Brown: I would be tempted to do that. Especially, the reasons I would be tempted are probably not the big hype reasons. The reason I would be tempted is there’s no PI. Like, I could get that through our data use review really easily, and it would make it more convenient. People would probably be excited to engage with that chatbot. What do you know about transactions per sales day?
0:15:47.0 Shashank Garg: Exactly.
0:15:47.2 Megan Brown: Gosh, there’s two paragraphs and you put in your slide deck, suddenly, everyone has the same metrics definitions that would be bad. Yeah.
0:15:55.0 Shashank Garg: Yeah. Megan, on that topic there’s a lot of people trying to experiment and push the envelope when it comes to use of generative AI models or large language models on top of structured data. And we know we had these challenges and it’s just really hard, not that easy. What are your thoughts on, like, do you see your users conversing using a chatbot with not even the models, yeah, but like just basic reporting? Yeah. Metadata or actual data, both actually, yeah.
0:16:32.5 Megan Brown: We’re not there yet at Starbucks. And I think one of the things that slows us down is really our mission and values. So we have to come at things not just through, like, what’s the most efficient, but also what works for our customers and our partners. And we’ve been through great change, so who knows? This could change in the future, someone could get very, very, very excited. What I can tell you is that business leaders in international are very excited about it. They want it everywhere all the time, no matter what and I think I’m a little bit more of a naysayer, it’s kind of a part of my personality. So like, as soon as there’s a hype cycle, I’m like, hmm, I don’t know. I don’t know, it’s not ready yet. I do think generative AI will change a lot of what data science and analytics does a lot.
0:17:25.0 Shashank Garg: Yeah.
0:17:25.8 Megan Brown: So I know that is coming, I do believe that, it’s not really there yet. And so I get more excited about tiny use cases that are more about efficiency. Like, Copilots. Yeah, let’s go. Like, if it gets the first draft to the code, great. We can do the fun stuff like making it fit our code base. I have a use case that basically creates, applies a seven layer hierarchy to new data from old data. And so like, let’s pretend you have a bunch of products that you sell in your stores. And there’s an enterprise way of looking at those products, but it’s not quite enterprise, it really only works for North America. And let’s pretend you finally have some data platforms and international, and you have SKU level information. How do you apply that same hierarchy or a similar hierarchy with maybe some new categories?
0:18:23.8 Shashank Garg: Yes.
0:18:24.0 Megan Brown: To the new data quickly, without taking a month of a person’s time to go through line by line, fill it out.
0:18:30.7 Shashank Garg: Yes. Absolutely.
0:18:32.4 Megan Brown: Yeah. You train a Generative AI model to do each layer of that hierarchy and you have a human check it because someone’s got to use these eventually and they have to trust it.
0:18:41.0 Shashank Garg: Yes.
0:18:41.4 Megan Brown: So that’s, I’m really excited about that, but it’s so small. And it’s really is about efficiency ’cause we’re gonna have SKU level categorized data for every single one of our markets in the near future because of this work. But it’s also not like it’s not driving incremental value, it’s not going to be life changing, it’s just gonna be something that goes in the background someday. Oh, you’ve got a new item, run it through the thing, and then it shows up in EPH. Great. Wonderful.
0:19:09.2 Shashank Garg: Yeah. Yeah.
0:19:11.0 Megan Brown: But it’s like, I actually, what I want from generative AI is I want it to do my dishes and laundry. I don’t want it to do the fun parts of my job. The creativity, I like writing. I don’t, I think it has a pretty bland voice. I don’t know that I’m gonna use it to make like a strong pitch deck. I want it to do the stuff that’s really boring and takes too much time and everyone rolls their eyes at, but does it anyway? Like, let’s do that. That would make my job so much better.
0:19:41.4 Shashank Garg: Absolutely. Megan. The way I am seeing a lot of our clients that we work for so sort of use of generative AI for all the backend stuff, which never gets seen. And sometimes it’s really hard to justify value and get a project approved there. But the beauty of it that I’m seeing, you don’t even have to get a project approved, the incremental investments in training, something like what you just said. It’s something that we as data leaders or analytics leaders should be able to find the bandwidth to work on. And if you take, the example that you just took, not that it wouldn’t have gotten done earlier, but somebody would be, nobody likes that kind of work.
0:20:28.3 Megan Brown: It would’ve made six people’s jobs really terrible for a few months. Would’ve.
0:20:35.2 Shashank Garg: And if that’s the case, then humans are very good at not doing a good job there. And if they did not categorize them properly, the repercussions are far greater. So if you’re making the boring work easier or cutting it down by 80, 90%, I think that’s a huge win. We know all the hype is around the user side of things that can I talk to data and these chatbots, and I think those will also evolve. And we’re starting to see, we’re starting to see platform players like Snowflake and Databricks and AWS Azure. Everybody get out there and say, here’s the fun way of you look at the fabric architecture and you can talk to your data. But there are challenges. And I think as a consulting firm, as an AI solutions firm, we often actually get to focus on all the backend stuff. And I think that’s where some of the real wins are in the short term, while we all work towards let’s talk to the data and the metadata, and then everything will be very easy.
0:21:45.0 Megan Brown: I think a lot of the same sort of thought processes that go into this smaller, less exciting backend work, will train the business to do the really exciting stuff. You’re not gonna have one bot to rule them all. You’re gonna have a bunch of little bots doing their specific jobs. Maybe at some point you’ll have a secondary layer, tertiary layer. Great. Cool. But you need to build those little bots first and you need to figure out if they need to talk to each other, how you need to track them, like how you’re maintaining them. All of these basic tech things that we don’t know yet. And so you need that in place, whatever AIOps is going to be, before you really have thousands of agents talking to each other, potentially making prescriptive decisions for your company. Like where is your checks and balances in that?
0:22:34.8 Shashank Garg: I really appreciate you bringing this up. I think when the hype is important, the Salesforce agent force is important, and all the agent tick AI is gonna, what you just described. It’s gonna happen. We all know it’s gonna happen, but before it can happen, there is so much work left on, even you just talked about something really, really basic as number one challenge being having a unified data platform for what you would call is a brand and a firm that we all love and probably has good systems already.
0:23:11.1 Megan Brown: They do. They’re intelligent.
0:23:11.3 Shashank Garg: And even there, the work is not done. And we’ve been doing this work for many years now. And that’s not uncommon across any of our clients. The setup of the data platform and ensuring the right glossary and metadata and quality and consistency. That’s hard work. And if you apply AI in general, and especially generative AI to reduce the treasury of people who manage it I think that’s a huge win. So thank you for bringing this up.
0:23:46.6 Megan Brown: Yeah. Well I think someone like me is really useful when you pair me with a pitch person. We have to work together because a pitch person left to their own devices will promise the sky, the sun, the moon, the stars, everything really fast. But to actually live through whatever the pitch person gets funding for you actually need a there there. And so working together with a pitch person actually makes their pitch a little more down to earth, which they don’t always enjoy, but also means that you have somewhere to start. Like you have a plan for how you’re going to get there, even if it’s not turn the switch and make all the money. In reality, we all know it’s a longer road than that.
0:24:30.3 Shashank Garg: Makes sense. Makes sense. Megan, one more question before we talk about some of the future stuff as well, which is what we’re discussing. Like if you apply whatever you’ve learned at Starbucks and we talk industry in general, maybe it’s retail, maybe it’s CPG, maybe it’s the whole, I don’t wanna call it fast food, but you get the point. What are some of the things that you would recommend people really look at in terms of use cases? Any advice there?
0:25:02.8 Megan Brown: One of the first places you should look to train up your teams are the least exciting ones. ’cause no one wants to build their first agent for the first time in something that’s super high profile. Maybe you have one person who’s like, ready to go with that and they’re working on that. Your other data scientists for whom this is new, like we all put AI on our resume, but this is new. And we’ve taken classes, but have we built the thing? Probably not. So in heading in that direction, like give them projects that are your boring cleanup metadata projects, data quality, and that’s like just a great thing because it makes their work better in the long run. It makes people’s lives easier in the long run and they can mess it up a couple times and still get to the end point.
0:25:49.1 Megan Brown: That just seems a reasonable place for a learning data scientist who really wants to get into AI to start and they can try the fancy things, by all means go for it, but it’s contained. It’s not gonna raise any, no one in the press is gonna be like, you used an agent to do meta. No. So it’s the risk is really low and the reward is still there. Even if it’s not incremental money. I still think there should be an investment in whatever’s coming next. You still need your seed funding, you still need your proof of concepts, you have to, they’re not, I think the other side is that in business we are successful all the time. All of us, no matter what are successful all the time. So having those things that may not be successful is feels bad.
0:26:38.6 Megan Brown: But you have to have some tolerance for failing fast, some tolerance for what happens if we put 200K into this thing and it didn’t work out, is that gonna be okay? Are we gonna fire people or are we just gonna say, alright, let’s try it again this way? That’s the kind of room that people will need to do the big stuff. And some cultures have that and some don’t. And so if you don’t have it, you have to figure out how to build that at least in a small corner of your company.
0:27:06.3 Shashank Garg: That’s great advice. Thank you so much. And one of the things that we often talk about with our clients is, especially now, and at least start with an AI first mindset where there are traditional ways of doing things and at least start there. By that we also mean that failure is a given. And some things are just gonna break. So that whole culture of experimentation failing fast, that’s really possible with AI now. I don’t have to wait nine months to build out something and realize that this didn’t work. I can actually produce something in six weeks and throw it if it didn’t work.
0:27:45.0 Megan Brown: Indeed.
0:27:45.9 Shashank Garg: So I think just shifting to that AI first mindset with rapid experimentation, and I’m actually seeing, I’m quite excited that I’m actually seeing organizations start there the way exactly you said. Start with some seed funding. There’s buying from the top and the whole people becoming vulnerable and saying that, Hey, this didn’t work. It’s becoming much more of a reality than it was 10 years ago at least. Let me just say that.
0:28:08.4 Megan Brown: And I think that the truth is that there are a few big companies that maybe can make this work within their big companies and companies that aren’t tech. Tech first. You’re gonna have to mess around and find out there’s a, like you really will have to figure out what works for you, what works for your employees, what works for your processes, and then where you can find value out of it. And sometimes that value will be money and sometimes the value will be efficiency in roles. Like your clever data scientist now spends 30% of their time getting data ready for a model instead of 80%, and they can do more models. That’s amazing. So that’s what every data scientist wants. So it’s just like it all lines up. Yeah.
0:28:57.5 Shashank Garg: At some point the real definition of a data science can have less of data engineering…
0:29:00.9 Megan Brown: Yes. Less terrible data engineering. Let’s be clear about that. The data engineers do great data engineering, data scientists do data engineering.
0:29:14.4 Shashank Garg: Yeah. Megan just moving ahead. For organizations like Starbucks of that scale and many more what are some of the trends that you are seeing that you think will become real and everybody who’s listening into this podcast should really be paying attention to?
0:29:33.2 Megan Brown: Yeah. Well, I think, like I said, GenAI will be transformative, right? Like, it’s going to be, and your organization needs to be ready for that. You need some thought on how it’s going to transform your business, even if that doesn’t end up being exactly the way it happens. You should be thinking about the future because your employees are already nervous. We all know what’s going on in the job market right now. Your employees are already nervous about AI. If you don’t have a thought or a strategy, they’re just going to stay nervous. It will change things. Your employees know it’s going to change things. You should also know what it’s going to change to some extent. I think watch out for regulations like I work in international GDPR and everything that EU does is the most kind of conservative take on data, ML, AI if you are a global company, like ideally, you already have people thinking about this and they just need to train themselves on AI to get going. But that’s fast changing. Like it’s rapid and the US might not be the foremost…
0:30:48.7 Shashank Garg: Yeah. We’ll get there.
0:30:49.5 Megan Brown: Leading the charge. Like us and our very distributed non-regulation kind of world that doesn’t pan out that way other places. And then I would say make sure that everyone that you have working for you that’s gonna work with AI, which is everyone is ready. There’s just some fundamental training that needs to happen, even if you’re not building the things. Is your data trust where you need it to be? Is your data culture ready? Are people scared about their jobs or have you given them some sense of a little bit of security or stability?
0:31:27.5 Megan Brown: And then do they understand what these models do in like a conceptual sense. They don’t need to know how to build it, but do they understand what it’s doing? And then that would help them trust it a little more. And I think be very clear about whether it’s predictive or prescriptive. I think there are actually very few processes. So deep learning, for example, there are very few places where businesses are actually comfortable with deep learning because you can’t tell what it’s doing. It makes decisions. It has these layers that do different things. You don’t know what it’s doing. And mostly people are not comfortable with that.
0:32:05.0 Megan Brown: So there’s only really a couple of places where deep learning really comes in handy in business. AI’s kind of the same way. What you don’t really know what the models are churning through, you know, what you trained it on. You might have some explainability metrics, but you don’t really know where are you comfortable making decisions without a human check when you don’t know what the model’s doing? And I think the answer to that is very few. You’re probably going to lean more towards predictive and you’re probably gonna have a human somewhere in the loop, at least one place to make sure what’s coming out of the model is consistent and reliable.
0:32:41.9 Shashank Garg: Absolutely. And thank you so much for sharing that. In our clients, if I look through, what are some of the things that I’m seeing becoming very real? And you talked about you started with GenAI and those, you know, persona-based assistance, whether if you’re a B2B, the whole presales assistant, if you’re a seller, a B2C seller, then personalization or being able to personalize your marketing campaigns. I think just looking through all the roles, like even like we are a data AI solutions services firm. Then use of copilots for our developers, use for better summarization engines on our knowledge for our consultants. So just persona-based assistance. We actually, for a pharma firm, we did assistant for the CFO’s office on financials and bringing down cost of clinical trials, data management. So that, I think that’s gonna become very real.
0:33:38.3 Shashank Garg: You talked about sort of building trust in the data. I think that’s gonna continue to be very, very important. You brought up attention to regulation. And I fully agree. I think US will come in there, we have seen at least two, three regulations on AI just in the last 12 months. And I think they’ll continue to strengthen. One thing that you had spoken about earlier is the whole, right now there’s just too many tools. AI tools in all the different layers. I think when I was talking to you, you had mentioned that there will be some consolidation.
0:34:13.7 Megan Brown: There will be some consolidation. I’m actually of two minds about it. Where it’s like, often you get a lot of innovation from smaller companies, but if the smaller companies are using the larger companies platforms, I don’t know how far they can go. And there’s a big risk to the smaller companies there of just being eaten. So in some ways I’m excited to see what the smaller companies are doing, especially if they’re dishes and laundry, great, let’s go. But then I like there are so many, and companies like Starbucks I think might choose five, but they’re not gonna choose 40.
0:34:53.3 Megan Brown: And eventually after they have those five, they’re gonna wanna narrow it down to one, because that seems to be like a process I’ve seen in a couple different companies. And how is that consolidation gonna happen aside from the pressure within large enterprise? I think we’re just gonna see a lot of shifting and changing. And so I actually don’t know how people are investing other than like a peanut butter approach. ’cause it’s like, who’s gonna win? We don’t know. Maybe the big ones. Yeah. Right. So I really don’t know.
0:35:24.1 Shashank Garg: And I think what I’m seeing across all our clients, Megan, obviously this has been talked about, the higher you are in the stack, your startup, the lower the amount and risk of you getting cannibalized. And at least we are starting to see across our clients that at least at the top layer you can build, the tools are available, the platforms, APIs are available, the models are available. You can put them in your own cloud, you can put them OnPrem if you wanted that within your tight wall. So you take care of security concerns and all that. And the cost keeps coming down. At least with the generative AI piece, the cost just keeps, from the first point they came out versus today is probably a 100x decrease for maybe a 20x better output.
0:36:16.4 Shashank Garg: So I’m excited that level of innovation, and I think there’s a lot of build opportunity for everybody who’s in this field. For people who are listening in. If you’re a data engineer, if you’re a data scientist, if you’re a business analyst, application developer, I think there’s just a lot more you will be able to do. So continue to monitor all those startups. Those are great ideas. Some of them will get consolidated, but even if you don’t buy them, you may be able to build something that is specific to your business, depending on your business’ appetite is how I see it. So it’s good times, great times to be in as I say it. Just to wrap things up any sort of final piece of advice for our listeners? We’ve got people from the business side, we’ve got people from the data side listening in.
0:37:03.7 Megan Brown: I think this will be a little, this is kind of strange advice coming from a data scientist, but I’m going to give it anyway. One of the reasons I write and do modern dance is because it keeps me working on it, having an open mind. I am more hopeful and better able to envision a different future because I do those things. And knowing that the future’s gonna change rapidly. We’re going to live through a great deal of change. It’s already started. It’s coming for all of us. What do you need to do to maintain an open mind about what’s coming? Because it’s so easy to settle into fear, like, oh my God, will I have a job? It’s really easy to land there when you’re thinking about generative AI.
0:37:52.4 Megan Brown: But actually if you take a more proactive approach, or if you imagine the parts of your job you dislike going away and then imagine a path to that keeping an open mind over the next five years is gonna be a ridiculous asset. So while I’m a bit of a naysayer, I still know it’s coming and I still think about how we’re going to use it. And I try very hard to not land in the fear space about like, this is gonna change everything. Oh my gosh, I don’t know what to do. And it will change everything, but I intend to be a part of that change, not really as affected by that change. And so whatever you need to do to keep your mind open and keep your views of the future a little more optimistic is a great thing.
0:38:38.5 Shashank Garg: Yeah. That’s a great way to put it. And in my role as sort of the founder, CEO of InfoCepts, I get these questions quite a bit. We work with a lot of people both on our client side and everybody that we hire and train. And while in theory we expect 80% gains of productivity just using copilot for developers, we’re still in serious shortage of good data engineers. And that’s a reality. And even on the business side, people who become this translation layer for business leaders who are ensuring that you have some new tools now and as far as you’re staying on top and keeping an open mind, then your demand for your skills will just keep going up and up. So fully agree. Thank you so much Megan for everything that you shared, this was, I must say this was one of the most practical, realist, sort of real kind of sessions, so I’m sure our audiences enjoyed. Thank you.
0:39:42.8 Megan Brown: Thanks. Thanks for having me.
0:39:44.5 Shashank Garg: To our listeners, we hope you enjoyed this episode of The Intelligent Leader with me, Shashank. If you liked what you heard, please consider sharing it with your network, using the hashtag The Intelligent Leader. And don’t forget to subscribe to our podcast by hitting the subscribe button you wouldn’t wanna miss many more episodes. Thanks for tuning in. Thank you.
Fady Boctor, President and Chief Commercial Officer at Petros Pharmaceuticals, joins host Shashank Garg to explore technology’s transformative impact on healthcare. He discusses how data empowers consumers through self-service platforms and emphasizes the importance of a balanced approach, combining technological innovation with human oversight. Fady also discusses how FDA-friendly regulations can further drive patient engagement.
- 00:44 The Role of Technology and AI in Pharma
- 02:50 FDA Regulations and Market Landscape
- 06:42 Building a Self-Service Platform
- 09:45 Patient Education and Engagement
- 17:21 Challenges and Oversight in AI Implementation
- 25:22 Future Trends in Healthcare and Technology
“Now we’re starting to bring the consumer into the picture of healthcare delivery, where we’re starting to rely less and less potentially on primary care practitioners for the more transient, relatively easy to diagnose, relatively easy to treat conditions. And now we’re starting to empower consumers to make those decisions and seek those treatments for themselves, leveraging their own custom healthcare data.” – Fady Boctor
“We always talk about giving the right data at the right time, in the hands of the right stakeholders, and that achieves certain outcomes. But now, to be able to take the same data, marry it with technologies, regulations, and create an entirely different ecosystem where you can serve many more, and we’re starting to see many such transformations happen across the industry.” – Shashank Garg
“In many respects, we have high bets, high bets on technology, the infusion and the conversions of technology led by way of artificial intelligence, but so much more.” – Fady Boctor
0:00:07.5 Shashank Garg: Welcome to the Intelligent Leader Podcast. I’m your host, Shashank Garg, and today we have a very exciting leader with us. We have Fady Boctor, Fady is the President and Chief Commercial Officer of Petros Pharmaceuticals. Just to introduce Fady, he’s a bit of a data nerd, loves data and AI and infusing technology to do business. In fact, he’s, it wouldn’t be unfair to say, Fady, that you’re almost betting the firm, on this. I’ll let you talk about the recent announcements around what Petros is trying to do.
0:00:47.4 Fady Boctor: Thank you, Shashank. It’s good to be with you today and great topics, worthy of discussion. Yeah. In many respects, we have high bets, high bets on technology, the infusion and the conversions of technology led by way of artificial intelligence, but so much more. And so, yeah. Just about 25 years in the industry, been with the big players, the traditional innovative products. Everything from respiratory to cardiovascular to hospital grade, carbapenems, antibiotics. So phenomenal side and journey on the innovation part. The pharmacological innovation part. Recently, found myself gravitating towards leveraging tools of old, but in new ways for new purposes delivered in expanded access and leveraging various technologies. And I’m pointing directly around technology that helps consumers appropriately, self-select as over the counter options of prescription grade medications. So, yes, to answer your question, a bit of a data nerd, high bets, high risk, high reward, and loving the journey that I’m on.
0:01:51.3 Shashank Garg: Fady, do you wanna describe for the audiences a little bit about what exactly that means, the self-service, self-selection, and how does that change the pharma industry, why are you so excited about this and what’s the opportunity here?
0:02:06.9 Fady Boctor: So the opportunity really revolves around leveraging fantastic therapeutics that have been on market for a decade plus, but maybe have only had a certain population that have accessed it because they’re limited to prescription access alone. In our particular case, for our flagship asset that will sort of become the debut for this new technology. It’s in the erectile dysfunction marketplace. So, to quickly just quantify the answer, 25% of the 30 million men in the US have been estimated to seek treatment. That means three quarters of 30 million men in the country have not, simply because, among many reasons, cost, physician access, prescription medications, taboo stigma, embarrassment, any number of those reasons, they bind prescription medications to a limited population. So the technology we’re going after, and, I think the marketplace that’s currently before us, the FDA has understood this. It’s nuanced prescription medications that are not easily converted to over the counter, such as ibuprofen or antihistamines, but product that have significant contraindications and have significant concerns, still safe, largely safe, but with nuanced contraindications. How do you put those in the hands of the consumer without the burden of a prescription?
0:03:28.6 Fady Boctor: So the FDA has mentioned before, middle of 2022, indicated that they’re opening the door for technology assistive devices and for manufacturers to be innovative in the development of those technology platforms. We’ve been working on that since, and we currently have a proprietary web application that is in pursuit of a software as a medical device approval that essentially helps the consumer to appropriately self-select or deselect based on their clinical profile to purchase a prescription grade product over the counter. And that is the exciting frontier. And it’s critical because we think those medications, their innovation still has not been fully tapped into by the subject population, the patient population it was intended for.
0:04:10.6 Shashank Garg: And that’s exciting to hear. And Fady, what just you’re describing in my mind, I’m going through, this business is not even possible without the right use of data, web technology, and building that self-service platform. You just couldn’t do it, the way you’re doing it is the only way of doing it. And the fact that FDA has come around and said that we will support it, is, you couldn’t be in better times. This is the best time to be. And in things like these. Right?
0:04:43.6 Fady Boctor: Agreed. The landscape is ideal. In fact, 10 years ago, this idea came up with FDA and they called it back then, ensure non-prescription utilization, and the acronym goes on, but nothing happened, nothing formed from it. So, to your point today, the market landscape, the average American has spoken loud and clear. The American public has spoken loud and clear. The FDA has started to acknowledge technology’s emerging, and there is this new vacancy, this new emerging potential to meet tremendous need of self-care with prescription grade medication. So to answer your point, yes, this is the right time to do so.
0:05:20.9 Shashank Garg: Awesome. And Fady, just to introduce a little bit about myself and the firm, InfoCepts, the sponsor for this podcast. So we’ve been in the data analytics and AI industry for two decades, and what you just described is the exact set of transformations that excite us. Data can serve many purposes. It can be operational reporting, it can be keeping everybody informed. It can, ensuring that we support decisions, executive decisions at the right time. In the data business we always talk about giving the right data at the right time in the hands of the right stakeholders, and that achieves a certain outcomes. But now to be able to take the same data, marry it with the technologies, the regulation, and create an entirely different ecosystem where you can serve many more men in this case, the American population, is a huge transformation. And there are several such examples that we are supporting with many clients, we work across industry clients, retail life sciences, media, and we are starting to see many such transformations happen across the industry. But it’s really a pleasure to have you, personally, who’s driving this transformation at Petros, and to talk about that. Just moving a step forward. Fady, could you lay out for our audiences when you talk about this platform, what does it really mean? So what’s happening behind the scenes and what role data and AI is playing in implementation of such a platform?
0:07:04.3 Fady Boctor: Yeah. I appreciate. I think one key component for any technology is, what is the foundation that it’s built upon? And in our case, it’s built upon the drug facts label. So, the drug facts label represents millions of dollars of investment, thousands of patients tested in consumer, sort of, examined. And we understand what is safe use and what is not safe use. So, we take the drug facts label, we build algorithms based on that drug facts label, those algorithms then fuel certain questions, consumer layman friendly questions. And these questions, basically ask the consumer about their medical history, their medication history. The algorithm of the DFL or the DFL is a source driving the algorithm behind each of the questions, helps the consumer understand, is this appropriate for me or isn’t it? So as they’re answering questions, they’re establishing a profile of appropriate user or inappropriate user. And as in its most basic form, that’s what this proprietary web application is intended to. There are additional artificial intelligence components, machine learning components, that help seal the deal, help seal the picture. But that is in its essence what we’re doing. It’s supposed to be transient, just a few minutes of engagement right there in our retail pharmacy shelf and aisle. You’re engaging with this web app, within minutes you’ve been deemed appropriate or inappropriate based on a clinically defended, algorithmically driven medical history questionnaire.
0:08:36.4 Shashank Garg: That’s great. And for anyone who’s listening this, we talk about democratizing data and AI to a larger population within the organization. What we’re talking about from hearing from Fady is an example where they are democratizing this information and determining eligibility for a particular drug which is approved, clinically approved by the FDA. So ensuring that the regulator is fully on board and doing that in a safe way. And the fact that we can do that at scale, is just fantastic and the right time to be in the data and AI industry. So thanks for sharing that, Fady. Moving on and just sort of looking at the broad pharmaceuticals industry, and pharma industry talks about building such, and if I may use the generic term, patient education platforms and supporting self-care, not just to do what you are doing, which is taking prescription drugs over the counter now, but just supporting themselves. Hey, could you share how to do this right? And what can go wrong in this because it’s very sensitive. So how do we do this, right?
0:09:51.8 Fady Boctor: I think we do this right by educating the patient within the engagement. So sometimes you go to your doctor’s office and you can tell, a good doctor will not only ask you questions and write down your answers and include your answers and then make a decision, but a good doctor will counsel you and he’ll educate you or she’ll educate you. So as they go through, they ask a question, they’ll say, “Here’s why I’m asking the question, or do you understand why I’ve asked this question?” So the right way this is done is to help a deeper engagement with the healthcare environment, meaning we know that the patient is interested in receiving therapy, we’re gonna ask them questions about their health, but then do we educate them as to why we’re asking those questions? What else could be happening? What is the source of ailment? Is this a comorbidity to our larger deal?
0:10:35.8 Fady Boctor: Is there something larger underlying happening? Or, basically said, if we’re asking a question about how often you have so-and-so symptom, we’re explaining why that’s of concern to us. We do that. And not only are we correctly and appropriately educating the patient, but we’re also getting their accurate disposition. And I think that is the right way to do it. And that’s what our technology intends to do. We educate them as we ask the questions. We offer them tabs for more information. We don’t take it for granted that they’ve understood everything that we’ve said or everything that we’re asking them, which either way, the FDA holds us accountable to such a value. We couldn’t just say, we wanna take this prescription drug and convert it to OTC without a public health value. So the public health value is intrinsic in our altruistic mission. FDA holds us accountable to that as well.
0:11:21.2 Shashank Garg: Thank you, Fady. Let’s, moving on. I’m just, maybe spend some time broadly talk about where you are seeing similar use of data and AI in pharmaceutical industry in general. Where do you think this is becoming very real, and very useful? If you wanna share from your experiences and examples there.
0:11:43.9 Fady Boctor: It’s interesting because there are a diverse… There’s a plethora of diverse uses of various technologies. Everything from clinical study or research study, implementation of artificial intelligence technology to help streamline the process, to help simplify and streamline and expedite results, expedite protocol. So there’s that facet, I see that happening quite a bit. Some for good, some not quite yet ready for showtime or primetime. And there’s also utilization, to your point, in terms of physician history and physician profiling and anticipating consumer behavior. There’s a lot of technology around that, whether it’s prescription data or generative AI data that looks at, if a patient comes from X geography with X profile, here’s what they’re likely going to prefer. We see those types of models occurring. I think many of them are still largely nascent. Then there’s, obviously technology and AI that’s leveraged, in our case, which I have not to be honest with you seen in this particular field.
0:12:47.2 Fady Boctor: And that is how do we validate the consumer? How do we make sure they’re not spoofing? How do we make sure that they’re not abusing the system, they’re not counterfeiting their profile? So there’s some security elements to make sure the person who’s answering the questions is in fact who they say they are by way of age, gender, and government ID, and so forth. And so from all the facets, I would say a lot of activity occur across the board, but there’s much work to be done to validate it and to get FDA buy-in across all fronts.
0:13:17.8 Shashank Garg: I remember, so one of our clients at a large pharma firm, our teams, and you talked about generative AI as well. So just for our audiences benefit. We don’t always have to look for transformational examples. They are the ones that require a lot of buy-in right from the top. But in my mind, in the whole field of data analytics innovative AI is starting to play a very important role, something as simple as, what we talk about, conversational BI or being able to ask the right questions. We have a solution called Decision360 and just organizational information. Sometimes it’s just very hard to find data, and especially if it’s a combination of structured and unstructured data. There’s technology available where on the top of your structured data, data warehouse, data lakes, you can marry it with unstructured data and make it really easy for your operational users to just ask questions.
0:14:16.0 Shashank Garg: And they can come in a narrative, where you check for hallucinations and you’ve done it in a secure way. So at least within the walls of your organization you’ve made it very easy for people to get to answers, which even after three decades of work, that’s how long I have been in this field, is unfortunately not that easy. One of the projects we did is for the CFO’s office, around the whole topic of clinical trials, cost management, it’s huge cost involved. And the CFO’s office will, for somebody in commercial, will come down very hard and heavy and say, “Why are we burning so much money?” And just make it easy for their analysts to talk to the financial data. Just made a huge difference there. Fady, I also see a lot of excitement and possibilities around enabling the commercial organization, the ones that the sales representatives who, actually call on the physicians. Are you starting to see any interesting examples of use of AI there?
0:15:25.6 Fady Boctor: So it’s interesting you had indicated, for training, certainly, so to develop multiple and diverse perspectives in training. So reps in training with physician profiles, those physicians that like to put up smoke screens. How do you leverage artificial intelligence, generative AI to ensure that the patient, the consumer, the representative rather, is diverse enough in their ability and capacity to communicate essential elements through the various profiles. So to be able to establish a variety of personalities for the representative to train on is fantastic. And I’ve seen that starting to emerge more and more. And I think that’s really, a largely, where there is a great deal of momentum. Targeting is another area. How to target certain geographies, certain prescribers, prescriber specialties, and then the story goes on. I think targeting payers is another area where you want to understand based on history and based on behaviors and contracts, where are the best, most productive contracts. So those types of things are currently in play from a commercial perspective.
0:16:31.0 Shashank Garg: Yeah. I’ve heard of a few things that you talked about, but what’s interesting is you earlier spoke about training, which is an angle that, I personally, haven’t seen as much, but that’s a very good one. And that’s where the generative powers of AI can be leveraged. You’re essentially saying that to train a sales rep to be able to respond to or deal with all the different smoke screens that a physician is likely to put up, can be very useful. And instead of just enabling them with data, “Okay, here’s the physician order history and here’s what you’ve done with them and here’s what they like you to do.” You also use some generative powers to, make them talk to an agent, for example, before they actually show up to a physician.
0:17:18.8 Fady Boctor: That’s right. It’s, you’re giving life to a profile and then giving the ability to also be, in many respects, unpredictable.
0:17:26.4 Shashank Garg: Yeah. Talking about algorithms, Fady, I know one of the last times we were talking about you had shared that sometimes it is not as easy to get the work right. And, can you throw some light there with your personal experiences, any areas that went bad didn’t pan out the way you expected?
0:17:51.0 Fady Boctor: Yeah. I think, and correct me if this is not the scenario you had indicated, but I think artificial intelligence can go wrong if any company decides to implement it without fully understanding it’s source model. What are the assumptions? What’s the model? What’s the model that fuels it? Artificial intelligence in and of itself is not capable of identifying its bias. It’s not able to correcting its bias or correcting its model. It’s subject to whatever model is fundamental to its thinking. And so in our case we, this was a vendor that leveraged AI in their, in one of our research study results. And unfortunately they leveraged AI in a way that was not overseen well, and therefore it was, the AI was left to interpret the results. Although it did relatively well, relatively in the 90% or better, probably in capturing certain transcriptions, it missed certain key elements. It was ill-equipped to understand the difference between one word and its implications versus another. So although it didn’t necessarily do it wrong, it acknowledged the right word in the right way, but did not catch the implication of that word in this context. All that to say, yeah, FDA took notice.
0:19:08:0 Fady Boctor: And even if you’re 1%, 3%, 4% off, they’re going to take notice and that can’t happen. So I say that to say, there always has to be human governance, there always has to be oversight. And the person who established the model, the person, the vendor that that designed it should quickly and upfront identify, be thoughtful, be careful, look for these elements, pressure test and make sure that you know you’re not taking for granted. This is 100% accurate. So yeah, for all those reasons, I would say be mindful. Do not give artificial intelligence its own legs too soon. Without or without ongoing human governance.
0:19:43:0 Shashank Garg: You bring up a good point. And I’m starting to see across our clients and I’m realizing is that at the leadership level, because there’s so many AI initiatives and experimentation going on, because you want to promote experimentation, that’s how we move forward. I see some of some of the organization getting overwhelmed by just sheer number of initiatives that are going on. And to be able to pressure test everything is a challenge. So, what we’re starting to do is at least internally at Infocepts, we’ve developed our own sort of experimentation platform. We sort of call it, you know, sort of governed experimentation, right? So, you can load up all your use cases and the anticipated business value and the checks and balances that you want to put in place. Show result, data issues, the data quality, all that and sort of one seamless platform. So, at least for somebody like you or a person who’s overseeing many such experiments, they can decide, you know, which experiment is ready to take it forward to production and which one requires more pressure testing.
00:20:44:15 Shashank Garg: So Fady, what we realized also as the data scientists are sometimes not very good at being able to explain what the model does, and even when they do, because they’ve built the model, they’re so close, there is inherent bias in the way they’re gonna explain the model to a business user. So we sort of invested, create a framework around explainability and compliance. So the platform comes in built with those two things. And you can talk to the model, you can create different scenarios with the model, independent of the data scientist who’s actually trying to make the case, whether we should use this model. So just put an extra check on what you were saying that not every AI model is ready for prime time, especially coming in from the people who built it, and you have to have that oversight extremely, extremely important. Just around the topic of experimentation, Fady, is there anything else in your organization that you’re experimenting with that you’d like to share around this whole topic of data AI tech?
0:21:42.6 Fady Boctor: It’s interesting, I think we are in a place today, in addition to what we’ve talked about, there’s a significant amount of interoperability and data exchange. So, we think of TEFCA and QHIN and what’s happening with electronic health records, what’s happening with interoperable health information exchanges, the story continues on, there’s so much potential for experimentation. The beauty behind this experimentation is you’re building integration, models of integration. You’re not forming your own equation. You’re not forming your own, sort of, unproven model, you’re leveraging interoperable data availability to help your consumers, the patient, make decisions for themselves. So, we are excited to be a part of that experimentation process, ’cause like never before, the consumer’s data is so handy and available to them, well, why not leverage it and let it speak to their needs and let it customize solutions to wherever they wanna go, whatever they wanna treat. So we’re excited to be a part of that, sort of, development and that momentum, but that is definitely where we hope to experiment in the near future.
0:22:49.2 Shashank Garg: Fady, one more topic that I like to talk to executives about is this whole topic around change management and whenever you are disrupting, whether it’s internal or external change management and maybe we talk internal. So within your organization or your past experiences, whenever introducing, being more data driven or models, things that humans are not very used to, what has worked for you or not worked for you around the topic of change management adoption?
0:23:20.9 Fady Boctor: Well, the thing that jumps out at me most to that question is in our industry, because we’re so heavily governed by FDA and so many other subcommittees to sort of just the healthcare system, it’s important that we do not experiment on vital consumer engagement or vital healthcare and delivery. So with that said, one of the key areas is leverage existing technologies that have been refined, sharpened, and work phenomenally well, but maybe outside of your industry, maybe outside of your sphere, and bring them into your sphere. I think that’s where the exciting frontier comes in. And that also helps with change management because when you introduce something that’s new to your sphere, new to your landscape, but it’s been proven in its birthplace, you stand to have a much better, a platform of credibility, ’cause then now you’re interpreting how that proven technology can now be applied to your current sphere and how it could help drive momentum and progress in your current service area. So I think in terms of change management, go there first. Always look to see what phenomenal technologies already exist in other industries and see how they could apply and be customized and be transformed to your particular area. I think you’ll find tremendous mileage, tremendous amounts of options available to you with little disruptive, people are afraid of bringing on new things in new ways, change the new thing and just bring it into a new way.
0:24:50.9 Shashank Garg: Yeah. I like the thought process there. And you’re right, in a heavily regulated industry, people are gonna be that much more shy, so the easier or the smaller the change, at least the perception of the change, the smaller it is, the higher the chances of adoption. Makes sense. Fady, just a couple of more questions that I wanna get your thoughts on, one, if you look at broad pharma healthcare industry, what sort of technology trends that you’re most excited about going forward, anything that you’d like to share there?
0:25:28.2 Fady Boctor: Yeah. I’ll say that what I’m about to say speaks to an evolving healthcare marketplace, meaning we have about 120,000 physician shortage at hand, primary care specifically. And so what that said is a lot of the primary care and common reasons for a visit are starting to become difficult and more and more difficult to seek treatment for you, you’re on waiting lists, often you’re going to the CVS MinuteClinics, which don’t necessarily have a deep relationship with you, but they’re good in case of urgency, emergent care. But primary care is becoming more and more difficult. So what I see as an emerging trend that I’m excited about, are two things, one, first, the availability of our health records. So today I’m one of millions that has access to MyChart. MyChart gives me access to all of my healthcare records from, even from disparate institutions, I can see everything where I’ve been, what I’ve done, what’s been done, test results, appointments, everything right there on MyChart.
0:26:25.5 Fady Boctor: The consolidation of disparate health information has, is becoming more and more consolidated and more and more available. So that’s one key exciting factor. How does that feed into the next change? Empowering the consumer to be able to access that, to make critical decisions for their primary care. And with that, we’re a part of that expanded access by bringing more prescription medications to over the counter. So how do we integrate to that healthcare data, better, and equip the consumer to leveraging their healthcare data to make those critical decisions without a learned intermediary. And the story goes on. TEFCA and QHIN being developed over the last few years, and just the interoperability of health records in general, EHRs, Health Information Exchanges, they are maturing and they’re maturing quicker than we know maybe, than many of us realize.
0:27:14.9 Fady Boctor: That is an exciting new feature available in the healthcare marketplace, because now we’re starting to bring the consumer into the picture of healthcare delivery, where we’re starting to rely less and less potentially on primary care practitioners for the more transient, easy to diagnose, relatively easy to diagnose, relatively easy to treat conditions. And now we’re starting to empower consumers to make those decisions and seek those treatments for themself, leveraging their own custom healthcare data. I think we’re, it’s maturing quickly, but we’re still infants in this model. The future’s coming quick. I would say everybody should be on the lookout by the close of ’24, certainly by 2025, we should see some fairly significant leaps forward on those fronts. And it’s, that’s an exciting place to be.
0:28:03.8 Shashank Garg: And, well first of all, thank you for sharing these upcoming trends. And you’re right. And I was just thinking in, what’s going on in my mind is, so I know I track the data analytics and AI tech trends very closely, and what I’m starting to realize is the tech coming up so fast and combined with what you just said, the next 18 months, 24 months, can be very different for everybody in the life sciences healthcare industry. What sparked off as a, sort of, revolution or disruption with the whole generative AI launched less than 18 months ago, about 18 months ago, and we all gasped at the costs of training some of these large language models, and every quarter I’ve been tracking that very closely, it just keeps coming down.
0:29:8.7 Shashank Garg: It keeps coming down. And what we thought would be the cost to feed in all of your organizational data to a large language model, and to be able to talk to it in a meaningful narrative, in a narration, has come down a thousand times, has come a thousand times. So while the industry is progressing as you are talking, I think the tech is progressing very fast as well. And as soon as the cost starts coming down and we can get the right balance of experimentation and oversight, if I may call it, I think we are up for really, really cool things and transformation things in the coming future. Fady it has been fascinating talking to you. Any sort of last advice that you would want to leave our audience with?
0:30:57.2 Fady Boctor: Yeah. I’d love to, and I appreciate the time with Shashank, thank you, great topics of discussion. I would urge anyone who’s listened to our story to monitor PTPI, which is our taker on Nasdaq Petros Pharmaceuticals, and visit petrospharma.com, learn about our process, learn about our technology, the emerging technology and our current process in bringing the first prescription ED medication to potentially over the counter status by way of our technology, which could open the door for future portfolio assets. So, love the discussion. I think it’s the field that you and I are both in love with and passionate about and immersed in. And they should, people should tune in to see where we take it next.
0:30:34.2 Shashank Garg: Awesome. Fady, it’s been a pleasure having you on the show today. Your insights on AI, data change management, self-service, patient education and sort of the future of pharma and healthcare, incredibly valuable. Thank you so much for taking the time to share your experiences and expertise. And for our listeners, we hope you enjoyed this episode of the Intelligent Leader with me, Shashank Garg. If you liked what you heard, please consider sharing it with your network using the hashtag Intelligent Leader. And don’t forget to hit subscribe on our podcast by hitting the subscribe button. You wouldn’t wanna miss the next episode. Thanks for tuning in and see you next time.
In this premiere episode of The Intelligent Leader, Pete Cherecwich, Chief Operating Officer at Northern Trust, joins host Shashank Garg for an in-depth discussion on the transformative role of data and AI in financial services. They explore how these technologies are enhancing client relationships, automating quality control, and strengthening fraud protection. Through practical examples and actionable insights, Pete shares how Northern Trust is integrating AI into risk management and decision-making processes to drive efficiency and accuracy for the future.
- (00:52) The Role of Data and AI in Financial Services
- (04:51) Challenges in Data Utilization
- (08:40) Solutions and Success Stories
- (12:55) The Future of AI in Financial Services
- (25:01) Emerging Tech Trends and Final Thoughts
“In one sense, I need to go as fast as I can, because if someone gets to it, the finish line before I do, they’re going to be able to do this cheaper and better The other side, I can’t go so fast because if we make a mistake and we have a problem and all of our client’s data goes, out to the web. That’s a big issue, right? So trying to sort of thread that needle of going as fast as you can versus not so fast is our biggest challenge right now.” – Pete Cherecwich
“All the trends, whether it’s the rise of AI, blockchain, increasing focus on data, privacy, security, the underlying infrastructure powered by quantum computing. I think at the end of the day, I think what they underscore is a need for organizations to be agile and forward thinking” – Shashank Garg
0:00:02.8 Shashank Garg: Hello everyone and welcome to The Intelligent Leader Podcast. I’m your host Shashank Garg and today we have with us Pete Cherecwich, Chief Operating Officer at Northern Trust based out of Chicago and he has a wealth of knowledge managing complex client relationships in the financial services domain. Before joining Northern Trust in 2007 as the Head of Institutional Product and Strategy, he was with State Street Bank where he excelled in various executive and operational positions. Fun fact, Pete is also a founding member of the US Soccer Champion Circle. It’s an honor to have you on the show Pete, welcome.
0:00:41.5 Pete Cherecwich: Great thanks, appreciate the opportunity to be here Shashank, hopefully we’ll have a good session.
0:00:46.8 Shashank Garg: Absolutely, Pete just to kick things off we all know that AI and data has the potential to deliver significant value for the banks and today we are here to explore and talk about the role of data and AI in financial services particularly and how it is transforming decision making especially for leaders like you. We’ll talk about some real world use cases, share insights from your experiences and discuss practical lessons and tips that can benefit both business and tech leaders. I’m looking to learn a lot from you Pete and looking forward to exchanging ideas here. Before we dive in Pete, could you just tell us a little more about your role and what sort of drives you professionally?
0:01:35.0 Pete Cherecwich: Sure, so I like to explain what we do by this saying that if everyone has a 401k plan, maybe you have a pension plan or your parents have a pension plan. Our job is to make sure that the statement you get where it says you have $50,000, that that number is accurate, that there’s real assets behind that number and most importantly that we give data to all the individuals that are making decisions to improve that balance for you and get better returns. Said another way, we’re master plumbers of the financial services industry. So I’ll start there and then what drives me professionally Shashank, I love to learn, I love to compete and win and fundamentally I like coming up with solutions to solve client problems. That solutioning is something that always gets the juices flowing.
0:02:27.0 Shashank Garg: That’s awesome and good to hear and especially the work you everybody at Northern Trust is doing for everyone else out there. Pete, I was reading a recent sort of data and AI analytics leadership survey and what caught my eye is that while we all talk about the value we create in with data and AI tech, right? That about 92% of the data leaders believe that their data products are delivering business value. However, if you ask the same question to business leaders like yourselves, only 39% of the leaders felt the same and this gap has existed ever since I started my career two decades ago and that’s what sort of drives us at InfoCepts to ensure that this, we are able to bridge this disconnect and help organizations sort of truly leverage data for better outcomes. Personally, I am very passionate about this and I would love to hear your perspective as a business leader on why this gap exists and how you’re navigating it maybe in your businesses but before I get there, just curious to, you mentioned you like to learn a lot, so what do you do to stay on top of the latest and best in tech especially in the world of data and AI?
0:03:45.7 Pete Cherecwich: I’ll be honest, it’s twofold. One is good old-fashioned YouTube and other tools that you can watch videos and just keep up to date, so if you hear a word, you don’t understand it, I just watch it and learn and the other frankly is talking to peers, networking and especially peers in other industries because you find that other industries help you understand what your industry might not be doing and others have already figured out.
0:04:15.5 Shashank Garg: Actually, for me, in my role as the CEO of InfoCepts, I have the unique opportunity to talk and learn to a lot of our clients and prospects, sort of my role gives me that benefit but personally for me as well, I love connecting in smaller settings, roundtables, inner circle dinners and conversations like these and I’m really excited to have this dialogue on the challenges you are seeing today in the use of data and AI in financial services. So speaking about challenges, as you described, right? Data’s role is key in sort of asset management and overall financial services, right? And I’m sure you’re dealing with lots and lots of data. What would you call out or some of the challenges you see in effectively utilizing data and maximizing its value?
0:05:10.5 Pete Cherecwich: So there’s a lot of challenges but let me split data in two. So in financial services, there’s data that’s your product, right? So you actually produce data and you use data and then you have data you use to run your company just like maybe if manufacturing a bottle of Coca-Cola was my product, right? So I’m gonna separate the two out. For data as a product, I would say first and foremost is capturing it. There’s still a lot of places out there where the data is being, we have to capture it based on paper and so we have to actually use OCR technology, use machine learning, push it all through because some organizations are just not ready to give us the data electronically. So capturing is one. Lack of standards. In financial services, there are a lot of organizations that will send you data but they might do it differently. They might want to send it over an email, et cetera. So a lack of standards.
0:06:08.9 Pete Cherecwich: It’s funny, I was meeting with one organization, a depository, and we’re talking about blockchain years ago and they said, “Pete, blockchain is interesting but if you all can agree on a standard, I’ll settle trades in 10 seconds.” Don’t worry about real time. Agree on a standard first. Like, okay, that’s good. And the last piece on the product side is really on using data lineage but getting the understanding of what the word means. And the best example I can give you, Shashank, is cash. The client says, “Give me my cash balance.” “Well, what do you mean your cash balance? Is it what’s in the bank right this second? Is it what’s projected at the end of the day? Is it projected right now? The month?” There’s so many definitions of cash, you actually have to get it right. So that’s on the product side. About the business, the challenges for that is actually, we have a sea of data and it’s really trying to understand, not give me lots of data, but what’s my problem? What’s my hypothesis? And give me the data to then use for that versus just having someone produce all sorts of data that is actually fairly useless.
0:07:20.2 Shashank Garg: I’m sort of thinking through all our clients and generally in my experience, although you talked about the challenges on the collection and lack of common standards, but at least in financial services, I see that to be slightly better than some of the other industries like retail, CPG, and maybe even pharma, right? I think that the problem is a little more worse. But on the consumption side, and as you talked about, being able to. There’s lots and lots of data, but what’s my hypothesis? And just give me the data to serve that. What’s interesting is, I’m sure you must be starting to do that at Northern Trust as well, but we are starting to see the use of AI and especially generative AI. We have a decision intelligence platform, Pete, at InfoCepts, we call it Decision360, which is sort of this pre-built functionalities and tool sets to rapidly deploy analytics for particular use cases. So purpose-built for that hypothesis, for that use case, with all the advanced functionalities like blueprinting, scenario planning, role-specific insights, just to make that problem a little bit easier. And clients who are adopting that, we’re starting to see at least some of that go away. But going back to the challenges you mentioned, could you talk a little bit about. Pick some of those and see how are you making things better? What solutions you have in place? What’s worked? What’s not worked? Whatever comes to your mind there.
0:08:52.7 Pete Cherecwich: So I’ll take it from running the business, so any business, right? ‘Cause I think that’s easier. And I’ll start with one is, we’re trying to figure out how to use data to measure not only capacity, but where we are. We have waste in the system. And when I say by waste, it’s not people not working hard, it’s actually just pure what we’ve asked them to do is not worthwhile. So we’ve bought this platform called Enlighten. We take all the data feeds in from all the systems that people are using, and then we can see what they’re spending their day on. And so for example, something simple, we realized that they were spending 10 minutes a day clearing out their email inboxes and deleting things because we didn’t make the email inbox big enough, all right? So we needed to increase storage capacity. But then you sat back and said, “Well, why are they doing so much on email?” And so we’re able to sit down and then drive through and eliminate emails. And without the data of actually understanding what people are doing all day long, we couldn’t do that.
0:10:00.8 Pete Cherecwich: The next step of that, Shashank, is actually starting to look at how we can move work across groups and do that dynamically and have the system learn about where the capacity models are so that you’re getting the most out of your workforce versus having things done in silos. So that’s one positive. I’ll tell you where we messed up on that. When we first started rolling it out, everyone took offense that we were using data to manage their job. I’m an accountant. Why are you telling me that I should have capacity management? I don’t have anything that’s waste, okay? What are we doing? And so I underestimated the amount of change management that had to go along with that particular rollout.
0:10:47.6 Shashank Garg: You’re right, Pete. Just sharing some more experiences from our side. One of the things that stood out in our work with financial services Pete were, we actually developed a customer data platform for a neobank that sort of encompasses both front office and back office teams. It empowers them with real-time insights on stuff like ticket resolution, customer onboarding, the know-your-customer sort of processes. And the fact that these people started getting near real-time insights, they’re able to reduce a lot of the what you call the operational inefficiencies by as much as 80%, right? Just because of the automation that happened there. But doubling down on what you said, right? The whole change management piece of it, right? Do you want to just talk about what could you have done a little differently there on that piece?
0:11:48.7 Pete Cherecwich: I should have known upfront that there was gonna be resistance for anyone telling them that what someone’s doing may not be valued. And so, and that’s just, that’s human nature. And so you can automate it. And what I’m saying is not valued is that the client is actually not paying us for that process. So we can automate it. It doesn’t mean you’re not valued. It means the process is not valued. So putting in a change management structure such that we have proper training, we take away that concern about what they’re doing is not valued. We help them through that. That’s really important because adoption of this, right? Becomes key because ultimately, we wanted people to realize, “Oh, they’re taking away through this data the part of the job I don’t like, that’s repetitive or is not adding value so that I can do more clients and more work for things that we get paid for.” That’s a good thing. That sounds easy, very hard to do.
0:12:51.4 Shashank Garg: Shifting gears a little bit and wanted to understand from your perspective, obviously, there’s a lot of buzz around AI and generative AI in general. There are studies that claim that organizations that invest in those technologies right away are gonna be X% better in the next three to five years. And in financial services, obviously, being the first one to adopt certain technologies, there are people who are making claims that it is gonna be revolutionary. And are you starting to see examples where you see these things relevant for your business? What’s going on at Northern Trust?
0:13:34.1 Pete Cherecwich: Yeah. So I’ll put a statement down there that saying, I do think this is gonna change everything, all right? But it’s kind of like at the beginning of the internet. We don’t know how yet, but you can glimpse some things. And let me give you some examples. I’ll start off by saying a lot of what we do as an organization is checking things. So the amount of pure processing that we do is not so great anymore, right? Pure processing has been automated. You have some robots, you have other things to go there. So what do you spend your time doing? We spend a huge amount of our time doing quality control, double checking. A famous example is if you have a stock split, the price of the security should go down today and it should be in half, right? If you miss time when you post one, you’re gonna have a problem. So those two things should not have an impact on any financial statements ’cause they happen simultaneously. A system can automate that, right? It can automate the check. If you have a fund that’s an ETF that’s supposed to track the S&P 500, it doesn’t take a genius to actually look at the S&P 500 change for that day and say, “Did my fund change the same?” Right? You can do that check.
0:14:52.8 Pete Cherecwich: Now, get really, really sophisticated in terms of the types of things you do and learn when you’ve got it wrong, all right? So that ultimately you can keep training the model. So I believe most of what these banks do across the board will be fully automated. We will have models that check all of this. You talk about pace. For better or for worse, don’t know how to think, right? Ultimately, we have to go slow as a regulated entity. I actually have something called, we’ve got a model risk management organization that because I’m a regulated entity, if I build a model, they’ve got to test it and make sure there’s no bias, make sure, right? Everything’s working correctly, et cetera. So in one sense, I need to go as fast as I can because if someone gets to the finish line before I do, they’re gonna be able to do this cheaper and better. The other side, I can’t go so fast because if we make a mistake and we have a problem and all of our client’s data goes out to the web, that’s a big issue, right? So trying to sort of thread that needle of going as fast as you can versus not so fast is our biggest challenge right now.
0:16:05.9 Shashank Garg: Makes sense. Just recollecting from our experiences, I’m definitely seeing the three buckets, very clear buckets. One is customer engagement. So things like personalized or virtual trading assistant for your clients, whether it’s corporate or consumers, where it can look at your trading patterns, look at your buying history, your trade history, and then personalize insights. I think the amount of personalization AI can achieve can be quite unparalleled. In fact, we did a pilot with a large bank, just deep learning, transformer-based sort of neural network, which continuously monitors, analyzes data and tries to mirror human decision-making without having those biases.
0:17:01.9 Pete Cherecwich: By the way, that’s fantastic on the fraud side as well, as fraud protection gets better and better and better, right? Eliminating false positives as well as protection.
0:17:10.0 Shashank Garg: The second bucket obviously is what you’re talking about, streamlining operations. It’s a huge bucket. All the quality checks that you spoke about, all the processing that you do, I think organizations just benefit a lot. Then, you’re right that you have to go slow because the cost of a mistake can be really bad to all your clients and their clients, right? So. Are you? Also in the third bucket obviously we’re starting to see it just boosting productivity for senior roles, for example, around their decision-making. Are you starting to see anything in that bucket yet?
0:17:51.2 Pete Cherecwich: So it’s interesting. I’ll bucket that too. So when you talk about senior roles, right? I’ll start with just Microsoft and Copilot, right? So I’m now using Copilot and working through, it can draft my email responses for me. I was joking with someone recently that I need to take a class on how to write a good prompt, all right? Because actually telling Copilot what you want in the email is a skill, okay. And, but as I get better at that, it’s saving more and more time from that perspective. We haven’t got to the point, Shashank, where I can take my core KPIs all right? And drive that through some AI tools. We’re getting there. So we’ve kicked off projects to look at that. For example, if I look at go through risks. So if I take sort of here are all the places where I can have a very high loss because of market movement. And what’s the efficacy of my control structure? And then here’s some scenarios. And can it start to help me predict where I might have a problem and where I might have to invest in order to make sure that I’ve protected, right? From any downside risk of market movement because of a loss or an operational error, et cetera. That’s coming.
0:19:19.6 Shashank Garg: That’s hard. I mean what you’re saying is sort of where everybody would want to get to, but just to be able to get enough training data and be able to validate what is predicting is right, that’s hard. And I think everybody will get there eventually, but just as you earlier said, right? That balancing between how much risk you want to take versus how fast you want to move versus the checks and balance is very important.
0:19:48.1 Pete Cherecwich: But Shashank, for me, right? As I look at it, one of the questions the board always asks me is, “Pete, are you looking around the corner enough?” Right? So you know your risks today, but are you looking around the corner and saying, “Well, what happens if this happens?” That’s where we need help. I need help looking around corners and then running models to say, “Oh, this could happen.”
0:20:06.3 Shashank Garg: Yeah, yeah. One of the things that, just remembering, one of the things that our teams are starting to do, it’s just for just regular reporting data, just talking to the models, like we’ve got a solution, IntelliSeek, right? Where, as you talked about earlier, there’s tons of data and organizations and leaders sort of struggle with, can I just get to the right information at the right time? Just, we’re talking level 101 here, right? I think that has become easier with generative AI now. So that is something that I’m starting to see a lot of our clients solve using IntelliSeek solution, which is sort of this conversational, we call it conversational AI or conversational BI, whatever you want to call it, right? Just to be able to talk to your data. And if you look at the way we were trained from Excel to technologies to tools to look at reports and dashboards, right?
0:21:00.6 Shashank Garg: Just taking the next step and making it conversational, at least for me personally, as a business leader and for our clients has been a big change. And we’re finally very happy to see that we all can talk like humans to the system and it’ll talk back like a human and with real data. So that’s at least a good sign there. Pete, just a little bit on the AI side again, right? And talking about managing change. And I was just reading a recent survey, which said that one of the challenges businesses face with AI is knowing where to start with AI initiatives. They feel sometimes when they start, they feel overwhelmed by the sheer number of possibilities. Experimentation can be a hurdle as many organizations struggle with effectively testing AI solution and providing their value before scaling, right? When is it ready to scale out? And obviously long story short leads to the issue that realizing tangible value from AI investments and ensuring that they translate into meaningful outcomes becomes an issue. Are you, any thoughts there on what you guys are doing there and what you’re starting to see your peers do in that?
0:22:15.5 Pete Cherecwich: Completely. So I’ll start with just a general philosophy is with a new technology like AI, the research and it can’t be R&D in a lab run by technologists that are gonna do something and then present it back to the business. Doesn’t work. It has to be something that’s driven by the business to say, “Here is my problem. Let’s see. Does this technology help me solve that problem?” And if it does, fantastic, okay? An easy example, right? RFPs. So you can sit down and say, “We wanna use AI.” But the reality is if we say, oh, we would like to create an RFP response, right? Using AI, because we think that it can go much faster, right? Be more complete, et cetera. Fantastic. That can be done. You can then, the technology people can use different techniques to do that, test some things out, but we’ll get business value in the meantime. And so each step can be progressively more complicated and larger, but each step along the way is providing you business value on the investment you’re making. Versus, if I go back to the blockchain days, right? People threw up, 150 people just doing blockchain, but for what? They needed a purpose.
0:23:38.4 Shashank Garg: That’s so right. And I’m definitely in your bucket, just starting small with targeted experiments, maintaining clear communication throughout the process, starting with end users first and continuous education is the only way at least the AI projects can succeed. Pete one of the things that we sort of built internally as we looked at all our clients, we call it a fully managed AI experimentation and management platform. So it essentially, think of it something that forces you to do what you were just saying, which is you cannot do an AI experiment until you write down your hypothesis and to be clearly define what data you’re gonna use and the models and then explainability. And does it comply with your ethics framework? And does it check all the boxes around privacy and security, right? And it just, in my mind, as somebody who’s been a data scientist before, I know it sounds like, you’re gonna slow me down, but at least in the financial services industry, it’s absolutely critical, at least in the regulated space, right? That you wanna take something like that approach. Looking just beyond challenges, we know that the pace of innovation is only accelerating. From your perspective, what emerging tech trends do you think will be sort of game changers for financial services just in general?
0:25:10.1 Pete Cherecwich: When I think about this, it’s really the culmination of many technologies. And then how do they play together? So if I look at AI, I look at quantum computing, and then I look at blockchain, which then manifests itself in terms of tokenization, all right, which then again manifests itself in terms of digital currencies and things like that. And you have a, you can imagine a financial services industry that is pretty real time, pretty automated, all done electronically, right? And it’s coming. I don’t know when it’s coming, Shashank, but it’s coming. And all these technologies will force standards. Okay, so I talked about before, standards will come because ultimately, like right now, there’s competitors of ours who have their own coin, right? But basically they’re saying, “Hey, come onto our standard and we’ll make it efficient.” But standards will then, even if become interoperable, right? Because someone puts a standard layer on top, whatever, it will keep driving. And I just think that a huge amount of friction is gonna be taken out of this industry.
0:26:21.5 Shashank Garg: Well, we all look forward to those days. I like where you ended. All of this sort of coming together has to sort of take out friction in this industry that exists. And I’m a big believer of that. All the trends, whether it’s the rise of AI, blockchain, increasing focus on data, privacy, security, the underlying infrastructure powered by quantum computing. I think at the end of the day, I think what they underscore is a need for organizations to be agile and forward thinking. And I loved my conversation with you and some of the things that you are doing there with sort of balancing the need for experimentation and the right ways of doing things with a focus on value realization. Your advice on sort of staying adaptable and ensuring that that is happening is very valuable. Just to wrap things up, what’s sort of your one piece of advice for business leaders or data leaders who as you know our audiences, right? Especially from a financial services industry?
0:27:35.6 Pete Cherecwich: I would say that you must stay close to technology. You don’t have to be the CIO, but unless you can combine the business and the tech and be able to know the art of the possible, ultimately someone else will figure that out and they’ll go past you. So you got to keep learning, got to embrace the change.
0:27:58.5 Shashank Garg: Pete, it’s been a pleasure to have you on the show today.
0:28:03.0 Pete Cherecwich: Same here.
0:28:03.2 Shashank Garg: Your insights on AI, change management and sort of the future trends impacting financial services, incredibly valuable. Thank you for taking the time to share your experiences and expertise with us and our listeners.
0:28:17.5 Pete Cherecwich: Thank you for having me.
0:28:18.9 Shashank Garg: And to our listeners, we hope you enjoyed this episode of The Intelligent Leader with me, Shashank Garg. If you liked what you heard, please consider sharing with your network using the #IntelligentLeader. And don’t forget to subscribe to our podcast by hitting the subscribe button. You wouldn’t want to miss the next episode. Thanks for tuning in and see you next time.